Posted by: NorthCoast
« on: August 29, 2020, 07:08:53 am »
Not entirely sure where to post this, but right now the fuel burn per seat is very unrealistic. I've made a list.
Plane name Capacity Fuel burn Fuel burn per seat
Cessna 421 7 7 1,00
Britten-Norman BN-2 Islander 9 9 1,00
Cessna Caravan 14 14 1,00
Pilatus PC-12 9 10 1,11
Bombardier DHC-6-400 19 22 1,16
Britten-Norman MKIII Trislander 17 22 1,29
ATR 42-600 48 72 1,50
Dornier 328-110 33 59 1,79
Bombardier CRJ-100 50 90 1,80
Bombardier CRJ-200 50 90 1,80
Dornier 328JET 44 83 1,89
Let L410UVP-E20 19 36 1,89
Embraer EMB120 Brasilia 30 57 1,90
Bombardier DHC-8-200 40 76 1,90
Saab 340 34 68 2,00
Let L410NG 19 41 2,16
Embraer ERJ135 37 81 2,19
Bombardier DHC-8-300 56 123 2,20
Bombardier DHC-8-100 40 88 2,20
CASA CN-235 40 88 2,20
Mitsubishi MRJ-90 92 211 2,29
Bombardier CRJ700 78 179 2,29
Mitsubishi MRJ-100 88 202 2,30
Short 360-200 36 86 2,39
Short 330-200 32 80 2,50
Embraer ERJ140 44 110 2,50
Saab 2000 58 145 2,50
Embraer ERJ145 50 130 2,60
Fokker 50 60 156 2,60
Bombardier DHC-8-400 86 232 2,70
Embraer ERJ145XR 50 135 2,70
Bombardier Q400 90 251 2,79
ATR 72-600 78 218 2,79
Bombardier CRJ900 90 261 2,90
Embraer ERJ170 72 216 3,00
Embraer EMB170-200 88 264 3,00
Embraer E175-E2 88 264 3,00
Bombardier CRJ1000 104 312 3,00
Embraer ERJ175 78 249 3,19
Bombardier CS100 133 425 3,20
Bae 146-200 100 320 3,20
Embraer EMB190 100 320 3,20
Airbus A318 132 435 3,30
Boeing 737-700C 140 462 3,30
Fokker 70 79 268 3,39
Airbus A319 156 530 3,40
Fokker 70ER 79 276 3,49
Comac ARJ21 90 315 3,50
Embraer E190-E2 106 371 3,50
McDonnel Douglas MD-81 150 525 3,50
McDonnel Douglas MD-90 160 568 3,55
Boeing 737 MAX 7 172 619 3,60
Embraer E195-E2 146 540 3,70
Boeing 737-700 149 566 3,80
Boeing 737-800 184 699 3,80
Antonov An148 85 323 3,80
Airbus A320 180 684 3,80
Fokker 100 109 425 3,90
Boeing 737-600 149 581 3,90
Boeing 737 MAX 8 189 737 3,90
Boeing 737 MAX 9 220 858 3,90
Boeing 737 MAX 10 230 897 3,90
Boeing 737-100 124 496 4,00
Boeing 737-900 189 756 4,00
Airbus A320neo 195 780 4,00
Boeing 737-900ER 220 880 4,00
Sukhoi Superjet 100 108 442 4,09
Boeing 737-300 149 610 4,09
Boeing 737-400 188 770 4,10
Boeing 767-200 245 1004 4,10
Airbus A321neo 244 1000 4,10
Boeing 737-500 140 574 4,10
Airbus A321neoLR 240 996 4,15
Boeing 737-700ER 149 625 4,19
Boeing 737-200 136 584 4,29
Airbus A321 236 1014 4,30
Airbus A321neoXLR 236 1014 4,30
Boeing 757-200ER 239 1027 4,30
Boeing 767-200ER 245 1053 4,30
Boeing 717-200 134 576 4,30
Boeing 757-200 200 860 4,30
Airbus A310-300 240 1032 4,30
Airbus A350-800 390 1677 4,30
Boeing 727-200 189 831 4,40
Airbus A330-800neo 406 1786 4,40
Airbus A310-200 240 1056 4,40
Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner 360 1584 4,40
Boeing 777-8 440 1936 4,40
Airbus A350-1000 475 2137 4,50
Tupolev Tu-204 210 945 4,50
Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner 250 1125 4,50
Boeing 767-300ER 350 1575 4,50
Boeing 777-200 440 1980 4,50
Airbus A330-900neo 440 1980 4,50
Boeing 777-200ER 440 2023 4,60
Airbus A300-600 266 1223 4,60
Boeing 777-200LR 440 2063 4,69
Airbus A330-300 404 1898 4,70
Airbus A340-500 375 1762 4,70
Boeing 767-400ER 409 1922 4,70
Airbus A340-300 350 1645 4,70
Airbus A330-200 380 1786 4,70
Tupolev Tu-154 180 864 4,80
Airbus A350-900 440 2156 4,90
Airbus A350-900 440 2156 4,90
Boeing 777-9 550 2695 4,90
Boeing 747SP 400 2000 5,00
Lockheed L-1011-500 330 1682 5,10
McDonnel Douglas DC-10-30 380 1976 5,20
Airbus A340-600 440 2288 5,20
Boeing 747-8i 605 3146 5,20
Lockheed L-1011-1 400 2160 5,40
Boeing 777-300ER 550 3135 5,70
Boeing 777-300 550 3135 5,70
Boeing 747-100 550 3245 5,90
Boeing 747-200 550 3245 5,90
Airbus A380-800 853 5118 6,00
Boeing 747-400 660 4025 6,10
Boeing 747-300 660 4092 6,20
Boeing 747-400ER 660 4092 6,20
Ilyushin 96-400 436 2790 6,40
The columns didn't come out right, that's one of the downsides of the forum. But let's ignore that for now.
As you can see, there is a huge difference in fuel burn per seat. It's totally unrealistic, with big planes having a far higher fuel burn per seat than small planes. In the real world it's the other way around.
Also there are a good number of aircraft on this list with way wrong capacities, such as the 767-300ER having 100 more seats than the 787-8. What the hell? The 787-8 is way bigger than the 767-300ER, how can it possibly have fewer seats? Looking at real capacities, both aircraft are listed wrong. It looks like no research has been done at all when these aircraft were added to the game.
But this was about fuel burn per seat, which has a way too big difference. That should be brought closer together, maybe even give all aircraft the same fuel burn per seat or at least keep the differences small. If this means a total database overhaul, then so be it.